Vault 7 and The Death of Michael Hastings?

Journalist Michael Hasting died in the early morning June 18, 2013 when his Mercedes C250 mysteriously went out of control and crashed into a palm tree bursting into flames after having been seen traveling at a very high rate of speed on a residential street.

Immediately after, WikiLeaks released two messages on Twitter that added fuel to the fire:

“Michael Hastings’ death has a very serious non-public complication. We will have more details later,” said the first. Two hours later, WikiLeaks tweeted more specific information:

“Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him,” the second message read.

It was speculated by others that Hastings was working on a story about Drone Surveillance in the U.S.

Three years into the disappearance of Bowe Bergdahl in Afghanistan, Michael Hastings — the journalist whose reporting cost General Stanley McChrystal his job — wrote a Rolling Stone story on the missing soldier, a piece which the magazine called “the definitive first account of Bowe Bergdahl.”

Today, it’s noted in the WikiLeaks data dump: “As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks. The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations.” The phrasing “as of October 2014” does not preclude the earlier existence of such an ability.

Is it possible, as some have speculated, that the electronic systems on Hasting’s C250 had been “hijacked?” This WikiLeaks release does nothing to refute that contention.

Read more at: https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/

Advertisements

Who killed Kennedy: CIA, LBJ, or the Truly “Unspeakable”?

Who killed Kennedy: CIA, LBJ, or the Truly “Unspeakable”?

You may wonder why one might have any real interest in an event of 50 years past? The reason is that MOST of what troubles us today links directly to November 22, 1963. Many will say that it’s a “dead” issue; I say precisely the contrary. It’s very much alive and the logical progression of events stemming from that act is now about to consume all of us.

This is a very important read. It’s extremely well done and essentially confirms my own inquiries over the past 20 years. The writer very skillfully deconstructs the various major theories and quite effectively synthesizes them. The longer we ignore the most obvious aspects of John Kennedy’s assassination, and leave it unresolved, the closer we approach our own, unavoidable reckoning.